MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

A forum to discuss custom scenarios, campaigns and modding in general.

Moderators: Slitherine Core, Panzer Corps Moderators, Panzer Corps Design

uzbek2012
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1904
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:49 pm

MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by uzbek2012 »

Akkula wrote: Sun May 16, 2021 3:50 am Uzbek, I specifically ask you to open a new thread in AAR or Scenario Design in order to post your wall of images or action reports.
Come on man..... Otherwise it is a nightmare to follow all the other people posts.

Not as fast as for NATO of course but we also start the offensive from the territory of Belarus and the Russian Federation )
And so the passage for Russia )

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

The defense of Ossetia from the Georgians is completed !
Defense of Kaliningrad-completed
Defense of St. Petersburg completed )
The Ukrainian army is defeated - Kiev is taken !
Defense of Serbia completed !
The Polish Army is defeated (there will be no miracle on the Vistula )))
Warsaw is captured ! The Finnish and Norwegian armies are defeated !
The Hungarian and Romanian armies are defeated !
Iskander a formidable and excellent weapon )))
So something I dispersed that it is possible and Turkey is already being introduced maybe NATO will be able to resist longer ) They don't have a chance yet ;)

To be continued....
faos333
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 9:04 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by faos333 »

congrats!!
Battlefield Europe get the most from Panzer Corps 8)
Download the new 2.4 Mod here http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=47985
uzbek2012
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1904
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:49 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by uzbek2012 »

faos333 wrote: Sun May 16, 2021 7:56 pmcongrats!!

Thanks for the congratulations but it's a little early ) There remained so to speak the final honor the capture of France, Italy and so on In general wait for new screenshots from my passage )
faos333
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 9:04 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by faos333 »

uzbek2012 wrote: Sun May 16, 2021 10:31 pm
faos333 wrote: Sun May 16, 2021 7:56 pmcongrats!!

Thanks for the congratulations but it's a little early ) There remained so to speak the final honor the capture of France, Italy and so on In general wait for new screenshots from my passage )
Lets wait to see that :D :D :D
Battlefield Europe get the most from Panzer Corps 8)
Download the new 2.4 Mod here http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=47985
uzbek2012
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1904
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:49 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by uzbek2012 »

faos333 wrote: Sun May 16, 2021 10:52 pm
uzbek2012 wrote: Sun May 16, 2021 10:31 pm
faos333 wrote: Sun May 16, 2021 7:56 pmcongrats!!

Thanks for the congratulations but it's a little early ) There remained so to speak the final honor the capture of France, Italy and so on In general wait for new screenshots from my passage )
Lets wait to see that :D :D :D


Уже досрочно ) если не захватить 50 точек а просто окружить некоторые но не захватывать то можно еще 30 ходов веселится убивая капиталистов ;) Что бы счетчик потери еще вырос раза в два )

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Maybe when I get bored I'll do it ) And then Rome Paris and Copenhagen are very much waiting for them to be punished ))
faos333
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Colonel - Fallschirmjäger
Posts: 1465
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 9:04 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by faos333 »

:D :D :D as I see you are winning all over the places
Battlefield Europe get the most from Panzer Corps 8)
Download the new 2.4 Mod here http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=47985
uzbek2012
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1904
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:49 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by uzbek2012 »

faos333 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 9:33 am :D :D :D as I see you are winning all over the places
No why can I play according to the script and lose ;) And so there are no fortresses that the Bolsheviks could not take )))


P.s.
Or here playing for r Russia or the USSR it is necessary to lose that the majors and the golden youth would not immediately lose heart ? )
Akkula
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Posts: 1780
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 12:14 am

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by Akkula »

Hi Uzbek,
Nice playthrough!, congratulations :), it seems you really smashed the NATO forces all over the places.
It is interesting to see how early did you manage to win, it really does help me to work on the balance of the scenario.
Just a question, what difficulty did you choose?.

Best regards,
Akkula.

PS: I think you could use this thread to post your playthrough from now on. Your pics are very helpful to get the picture of the units congestion.
Eastern Front: Soviet Storm (v1.96): http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=50342
Modern Conflicts (v1.95): http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=72062
uzbek2012
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1904
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:49 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by uzbek2012 »

Akkula wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 8:17 pm Hi Uzbek,
Nice playthrough!, congratulations :), it seems you really smashed the NATO forces all over the places.
It is interesting to see how early did you manage to win, it really does help me to work on the balance of the scenario.
Just a question, what difficulty did you choose?.

Best regards,
Akkula.

PS: I think you could use this thread to post your playthrough from now on. Your pics are very helpful to get the picture of the units congestion.
Hi Akkula !
It was not difficult to break them since they are also advancing ) it was harder not to fall asleep driving around Europe in search of new enemies that usually crowded the cities )

The difficulty of the game Colonel ( that's what I think is realistic ) On the general and field marshal, our unit turns out to have 10 units from the enemies of 15-20, they have 5 stars of experience we have like some recruits with 0 ))) , and we still do not fight with the Chinese so that there would be such human reserves ) Not what cheats I do not use because my computer does not work on this game and I do not see the point of cheating, since then what is the interest of "bricks" to ) Well I will post pictures of the court however as well as my comments arguments and arguments )
what interest is there in moving the "bricks" back and forth at all? I do not understand why people use cheats in their favorite games unless of course they are developers or YouTube steamers )
You can of course play on the field marshal as I did in early versions 1.4-1.5 of your mod before playing in the single company for Nato and the Russian Federation, you just need more moves and nerves !

I hope my onalyn translator translated everything correctly and correctly )
uzbek2012
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1904
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:49 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by uzbek2012 »

So let's take Turkey to the pile so that Nato would have at least some chance ) You can also choose Israel ;)

In addition to airstrikes in response to attacks by Palestinian radicals, Israel uses its armored personnel carriers and Merkava tanks to destroy launch sites in the Gaza Strip. However, armored vehicles regularly suffer from Russian ATGMs "Fagot" and "Kornet", which are in service with Hamas,
https://discover24.ru/2021/05/rossiyski ... nsportery/

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

But now I like it better )) All European cities and capitals are captured ! All enemy aircraft carriers sunk, there are several submarines and ships left + a single Poseidon aircraft ) Interesting observation my strategic bombers if they fly up to the enemy blue mark and lose all the fuel why is this happening or did you set up the scripts this way ?

P.s.
I would also like to see the railway tracks laid in Europe at the end )))
Akkula
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Posts: 1780
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 12:14 am

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by Akkula »

uzbek2012 wrote: Tue May 18, 2021 12:20 pm Interesting observation my strategic bombers if they fly up to the enemy blue mark and lose all the fuel why is this happening or did you set up the scripts this way ?
That is not intended for sure, it must be a missing script or wrong one. I will check, thanks for the catch :D

About railways, I have a dilemma: if I add trains, I have to remove one air transport option. In the case of Russia is not a problem as the player already has a wide range of options (helis and planes), but for NATO that means to "sacrifice" one nation airlift option.
In my recent scenario works, NATO has air transports for USA, UK, Ukraine, Germany and NATO (SAC program, in the game applies to minor nations). If I go for railroads I will have to deny Germany or UK from having airlift.

Also, pretty interesting how different is the scenario time lapse playing as Russian. In this case it seems that 60 turns is a reasonable number. This leads me to think that I have to add more Russian defenses (that is not necessary translated as more units) to ensure more fun for the NATO player. But anyway, great feedback, that confirms that 50 or 60 turns is the way to go :D

Massive thanks for your feedback Uzbek, I really appreciate it!.

Best regards,
Akkula.
Eastern Front: Soviet Storm (v1.96): http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=50342
Modern Conflicts (v1.95): http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=72062
uzbek2012
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1904
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:49 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by uzbek2012 »

Akkula my friend The British Army has been sitting on their island so why do they need a Railway ( If they were all crammed up like mice in Scotland and lost London and all of Ireland ) The Germans like the Russians love trains + not one American tank Abrams will not reach Russia under its own power even from Poland and Latvia they arrived there on railway platforms from Germany so only on railway platforms of them) 60 cities-take for 60 moves what do I agree) Spain only has three tanks ))) so let's (leave Spain and Portugal without any military equipment at all ) alone but include Turkey !

Italian tanks from Ferrari and lambagirri let them stay in Italy in defense they are beaten even by Soviet T-62 m tanks

M-84AS1. Modernization of the tank in Serbian :arrow:
https://anna-news.info/m-84as1-moderniz ... o-serbski/

In Poland, when transported by rail damaged ten US Army tanks :lol:
https://en.topwar.ru/125356-v-polshe-pr ... -ssha.html

Loading platforms will be built on the new Rail Baltica railway
The Rail Baltica project, which will connect the countries of Western Europe with the Baltic States, provides for the transportation of military equipment.

As the Lithuanian edition writes Delfi.lv, in Lithuania, four sites for NATO military equipment will be built near the railway. The platforms are equipped near the cities of Kazlu-Rudy, Jonava, Panevezys, as well as in Palemonas. Each point will be able to accept up to 300 units of equipment.

Before that, the Latvian Defense Ministry said that it would seek to build a branch of Rail Baltic to the military base in Adazi, where NATO units with armored vehicles are stationed. The length of the entire branch is still 950 kilometers, and the project cost has already reached almost 6 billion euros.

Earlier, foreign military experts noted the poor logistics in NATO and complained that in the event of a conflict, Russia would seize the Priblatika in just a few days, and the transfer of units from Western Europe would take at least a week. Rail Baltica is likely to improve the situation for the alliance somewhat, but it is unlikely to radically resolve the issue.
:wink: :arrow:
https://dima-ignatiev.livejournal.com/8817.html

:lol: :arrow:
https://politexpert.net/103836-otpravit ... pribaltiki

Image
Image
At the expense of Strategic Bomber yes fuel from 130 is reduced to zero on the next turn) pilots probably pour the enemy aircraft carriers and loudly shout fuck your mother throw a lighter zipo or immediately your own plane )
uzbek2012
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1904
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:49 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by uzbek2012 »

The city of Saratov has an airfield the one at the bottom also does not provide fuel SO you can see that the dollars were fake ;) The upper one works without problems .

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Played with a save for NATO ) What can I say about this The airfield near the city of Tbilisi does not give fuel to a NATO plane ) The same thing happens in the city of Grozny ( you can see the saboteurs threw sugar into the fuel ) The city of Ulyanovsk is not possible to capture (apparently Lenin's homeland does not like foreign invasions ) In England, you can capture Ireland ( here the IRA group will "rejoice" at the English invasion ) Syria captured by Ukrainian paratroopers as the Greek do not know how to take off and jump with a parachute ) The rest is all in the screenshots, see, study, compare and enjoy ) Moscow and all the other cities were captured ) A good map can be made even of the 40 day recent war between Armenia and Azerbaijan ;)

P.s.
They measure who has steel balls ;)
https://avia.pro/news/dva-rossiyskih-tu ... v-novregii
Akkula
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Posts: 1780
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 12:14 am

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by Akkula »

Thanks Uzbek!,
I did take note of all your comments and managed to catch some issues thank to your pictures.
Some of those were already in my mind but others are new to me :P

Best regards,
Akkula.
Eastern Front: Soviet Storm (v1.96): http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=50342
Modern Conflicts (v1.95): http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=72062
uzbek2012
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1904
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:49 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by uzbek2012 »

Akkula wrote: Wed May 19, 2021 9:36 pm Thanks Uzbek!,
I did take note of all your comments and managed to catch some issues thank to your pictures.
Some of those were already in my mind but others are new to me :P

Best regards,
Akkula.
always please I am glad that I help to create great things :lol:

Image
58 the Russian army there in the Caucasus armed with Soviet equipment of the Cold War still drove the Georgians who were armed by the whole world all abandoned + two army hamers of intelligence in the port remained as a trophy of Russia )
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/58-%D1%8F ... 0%B8%D1%8F
Their T-72 tanks were Israeli-made ) But I feel sorry for the peacekeepers, many of them died ! Georgians are very short of Grad and Smerch rocket launchers

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Single Map Caucasus 2008) Georgians vs Abkhazia, Ossetia and Russia
Image
Good map I liked a lot of Georgians but they have zero morale and motivation )
https://en.topwar.ru/31594-avgust-2008- ... zduhe.html



Georgia if done correctly and quickly captures the set points even before the appearance of the Russian army ) If you have time for 8 moves, then there will be no problems ) in defense for a long time and you will still be broken )

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

https://www.arms-expo.ru/news/archive/g ... -16-05-00/
https://wikichi.ru/wiki/Georgian_Specia ... ons_Forces

Image
https://pulse.mail.ru/article/kak-specn ... 104069789/
Last edited by uzbek2012 on Sat May 29, 2021 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Akkula
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Posts: 1780
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 12:14 am

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by Akkula »

Yes, McGuba also sent me feedback about how easy the Georgian player (human) can win this scenario. Thanks for the comments.
I will work on this issue later, but for sure it will be improved by the next update.

Regards,
Akkula.
Eastern Front: Soviet Storm (v1.96): http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=50342
Modern Conflicts (v1.95): http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=72062
uzbek2012
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1904
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:49 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by uzbek2012 »

Akkula wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 9:35 pm Yes, McGuba also sent me feedback about how easy the Georgian player (human) can win this scenario. Thanks for the comments.
I will work on this issue later, but for sure it will be improved by the next update.

Regards,
Akkula.

But there everything is just selling your Georgian Buk m
https://topwar.ru/101687-sovremennoe-so ... -4-ya.html
https://flight-mh17.livejournal.com/223135.html
because Abkhazia and Ossetia have no aviation, and the Russian one will arrive only after the 10th turn ) buy a 122-mm multiple rocket launcher RM-70 in the free slots and follow the fire shaft to advance ) http://zonwar.ru/artileru/reakt_sistem.html/RM-70.html

Image
uzbek2012
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1904
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:49 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by uzbek2012 »

Desert Storm 1991 ! In general the United States and its allies did not manage to arrange a storm so the breeze is no more if you play correctly for Iraq ;)

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

There will be time to play again now for the United States ( last time I took even Baghdad without waiting for 2003 )

to be continued....

P.s.
Image
Special thanks to the creator for the Chinese tanks type 59-69 ;)

Image
Iraqi T-55A tank (late years of production, with an anti-aircraft machine gun installed). Iran-Iraq War, mid-1980s.
https://y4astkoviu.livejournal.com/330330.html

There is no picture now on the T-55 And in Iraq now you will be able to insert it into your mod )
Akkula
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Sr. Colonel - Wirbelwind
Posts: 1780
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 12:14 am

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by Akkula »

Thanks for your feedback about Gulf War 91!. I have taken notes of all your comments :)
Just like Caucasus 08, the scenario will receive some improvements as well :). MCGuba also sent me some suggestions.

Best regards,
Akkula.
Eastern Front: Soviet Storm (v1.96): http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=50342
Modern Conflicts (v1.95): http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=147&t=72062
uzbek2012
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Brigadier-General - 15 cm Nblwf 41
Posts: 1904
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 11:49 pm

Re: MODERN CONFLICTS (Passing and testing)

Post by uzbek2012 »

You don't have to thank me ) Thank you for making us happy with your creativity )

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

The US and the coalition can certainly crush Iraq to a pulp ) Baghdad is taken by storm ;)
Post Reply

Return to “Panzer Corps : Scenario Design”