Colonial Allies

[rbodleyscott]

Since colonial European ally contingents are (I think) only needed for native armies, and might be expected to form a relatively small proportion of the combined force, we probably ought to shrink them to a maximum of about 3 infantry BGs, like we did in Colonies and Conquest.

Do you agree?

[nikgaukroger]

Since colonial European ally contingents are (I think) only needed for native armies, and might be expected to form a relatively small proportion of the combined force, we probably ought to shrink them to a maximum of about 3 infantry BGs, like we did in Colonies and Conquest.

Do you agree?

OK.

[rbodleyscott]

Since colonial European ally contingents are (I think) only needed for native armies, and might be expected to form a relatively small proportion of the combined force, we probably ought to shrink them to a maximum of about 3 infantry BGs, like we did in Colonies and Conquest.

Do you agree?

OK.

In which case should there still be a compulsory minimum of Poor troops or not? (I think probably not)

[nikgaukroger]

Since colonial European ally contingents are (I think) only needed for native armies, and might be expected to form a relatively small proportion of the combined force, we probably ought to shrink them to a maximum of about 3 infantry BGs, like we did in Colonies and Conquest.

Do you agree?

OK.

In which case should there still be a compulsory minimum of Poor troops or not? (I think probably not)

Agreed, not.