Moderator: Slitherine Core
Nobody has ever said that beforepetedalby wrote:... 'thank you' to Phil Powell for getting us on the right track.
It turns out I’d been misinformed...philqw78 wrote:Irrelevant now
A wise precautionphilqw78 wrote: Just in case Terry gets even more delinquent, no knights are allowed
I really don't think the new book 2 lists should be used. Firstly, what Pete said. I'll be starting my army design next week based on the old books and don't want to change horses in mid-stream. Secondly, I (and Terry and Steve Murton) know pretty much exactly what will be in the new lists. So we would have an unfair advantage. Lastly, we finished the proof reading last week (several dozen dull hours); I'm not sure what the pre-production, print and circulation timescales are but I imagine longer than a month. So it would be cutting it quite fine I think.petedalby wrote:I'm not sure that's very helpful Phil. Who has asked you to post that?If the new book 2 is out in time these lists will be allowed, again subject to the date restriction of 550-1040AD
Players have entered Roll Call on the following basis:
With no guarantee of when the new V3 army lists will be produced we will use the existing Army Lists adjusted for V3 points. All players must submit their lists using the new V3 Army List spreadsheet. This will not be changed irrespective of when the new lists are published to give all players certainty.
Only the original army lists may be used for Roll Call. Mr Briggs cites some excellent reasons why we made that call originally.Never mind, at least you'll thrash Ruddock at the weekend. If you can find him after the warband have gone straight through him.philqw78 wrote:D'oh
