Syrian States - only 2 non-allied sub commanders
Moderators: philqw78, terrys, hammy, Slitherine Core, Field of Glory Design, Field of Glory Moderators
-
- Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:32 pm
Syrian States - only 2 non-allied sub commanders
Excuse me if i am missing something, but why are only up to 2 non-allied commanders allowed states general, while every other army i can find can choose 3?
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3100
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Fareham, UK
Re: Syrian States - only 2 non-allied sub commanders
It seems this restriction appears when an army / nation has a history of fighting amongst themselves or turning on each other.
There are some other examples - Ancient Spanish, Gallic & Wars of the Roses are 3 that spring to mind and I am sure there will be others.
There are some other examples - Ancient Spanish, Gallic & Wars of the Roses are 3 that spring to mind and I am sure there will be others.
Pete
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:01 am
- Location: Birmingham, Alabama
- Contact:
Re: Syrian States - only 2 non-allied sub commanders
I suspect this restriction arose out of the lack of cohesiveness the Syrian Turks demonstrated in the 1st Crusade. Prime example would be Karbuqa (Kerbogha in western sources), atabeg of Mosul's attempted relief and then siege of Antioch in 1098. According to most sources, Karbuga's army fell apart due to internal rivalries between the varied Arab and Syrian leaders that had joined his army when the Crusaders marched out to give battle and break the siege. Duqaq of Damascus' forces were the first to desert Karbuqa's army and the rest quickly followed. Most Muslim sources poignantly note that the other Muslim leaders were only in agreement in their fear of Karbuqa's goal of dominating them and chose self-preservation to crushing the Christians.
The following sources from the Moslem point of view help describe this sort of jealousy that doomed the Moslem position in the 1st Crusade and at times later derailed promising efforts to eject the crusaders from the Levant.
Ibn al-Athir, Izz al-Din, The Chronicle of Ibn al-Athir for the Crusading Period from al-Kamil fi’l-Ta’ rikh. Part I, translated by D. S. Richards (Surrey, 2010).
Francesco Gabrieli. Arab Historians of the Crusades. Translated by E. J. Costello (Los Angeles, 1969).
Amin Maalouf. The Crusades Through Arab Eyes, translated by Jon Rothschild (New York, 1984).
Ibn Al-Qalānisī, The Damascus Chronicle of the Crusades, trans. H. A. R. Gibb (New York, 2002).
The following sources from the Moslem point of view help describe this sort of jealousy that doomed the Moslem position in the 1st Crusade and at times later derailed promising efforts to eject the crusaders from the Levant.
Ibn al-Athir, Izz al-Din, The Chronicle of Ibn al-Athir for the Crusading Period from al-Kamil fi’l-Ta’ rikh. Part I, translated by D. S. Richards (Surrey, 2010).
Francesco Gabrieli. Arab Historians of the Crusades. Translated by E. J. Costello (Los Angeles, 1969).
Amin Maalouf. The Crusades Through Arab Eyes, translated by Jon Rothschild (New York, 1984).
Ibn Al-Qalānisī, The Damascus Chronicle of the Crusades, trans. H. A. R. Gibb (New York, 2002).
Last edited by berthier on Mon Sep 04, 2017 1:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Christopher Anders
2023-2024 GCC Coordinator
http://bloodsandsteel.blogspot.com
2023-2024 GCC Coordinator
http://bloodsandsteel.blogspot.com
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3100
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Fareham, UK
Re: Syrian States - only 2 non-allied sub commanders
Great post Chris - and I'm reminded of the excellent SPI board game of the 1st Crusade that models this really well with the conflicting victory conditions for each player - fond memories.
Pete
-
- Lance Corporal - Panzer IA
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:32 pm
Re: Syrian States - only 2 non-allied sub commanders
Thanks, Chris,
for this detailed and informative reply,
happy new year to all.
Sam
for this detailed and informative reply,
happy new year to all.
Sam
-
- 1st Lieutenant - Grenadier
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:01 am
- Location: Birmingham, Alabama
- Contact:
Re: Syrian States - only 2 non-allied sub commanders
In my research for the 1st Crusades Campaign that I am working on, I found a another reference to the fragmented state of the Muslims in Syria at the time of the First Crusade.
Kohler, Michael A., Alliances and Treaties between Frankish and Muslim Rulers in the Middle East: Cross-Cultural Diplomacy in the Period of the Crusades, Translated by Peter M. Holt. (Boston, 2013).
Chapter I is titled "The Development of the Syrian System of Autonomous Lordships (c. 1070-1099)."
Chapter II is "Relations Between the Frankish, Turkish and Arab States in the Period of the Syrian Autonomous Rulers (1098-1158)." This chapter has a section dedicated to relations between the Syrian Lordships and Allied Turkish Armies up to 1128.
Chapter III is "Frankish-Muslim Relations in the Period of Nur al-Din and Saladin (1158-92)."
Chapter IV deals more with Frankish-Muslim legal relations.
While only four chapters might seem like a superficial survey, this book actually weighs in at over 360 pages. Chapter I can be found on Academia while the entire book is available from Amazon and Brill for $193.00. Interestingly enough, Brill also offers an e-book for only $197.00.
Kohler, Michael A., Alliances and Treaties between Frankish and Muslim Rulers in the Middle East: Cross-Cultural Diplomacy in the Period of the Crusades, Translated by Peter M. Holt. (Boston, 2013).
Chapter I is titled "The Development of the Syrian System of Autonomous Lordships (c. 1070-1099)."
Chapter II is "Relations Between the Frankish, Turkish and Arab States in the Period of the Syrian Autonomous Rulers (1098-1158)." This chapter has a section dedicated to relations between the Syrian Lordships and Allied Turkish Armies up to 1128.
Chapter III is "Frankish-Muslim Relations in the Period of Nur al-Din and Saladin (1158-92)."
Chapter IV deals more with Frankish-Muslim legal relations.
While only four chapters might seem like a superficial survey, this book actually weighs in at over 360 pages. Chapter I can be found on Academia while the entire book is available from Amazon and Brill for $193.00. Interestingly enough, Brill also offers an e-book for only $197.00.
Christopher Anders
2023-2024 GCC Coordinator
http://bloodsandsteel.blogspot.com
2023-2024 GCC Coordinator
http://bloodsandsteel.blogspot.com
-
- Lieutenant-General - Do 217E
- Posts: 3057
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:48 am
Re: Syrian States - only 2 non-allied sub commanders
$190. WHooowee! that's high. I got 8 first crusade primary sources for less than that.berthier wrote:In my research for the 1st Crusades Campaign that I am working on, I found a another reference to the fragmented state of the Muslims in Syria at the time of the First Crusade.
Kohler, Michael A., Alliances and Treaties between Frankish and Muslim Rulers in the Middle East: Cross-Cultural Diplomacy in the Period of the Crusades, Translated by Peter M. Holt. (Boston, 2013).
Chapter I is titled "The Development of the Syrian System of Autonomous Lordships (c. 1070-1099)."
Chapter II is "Relations Between the Frankish, Turkish and Arab States in the Period of the Syrian Autonomous Rulers (1098-1158)." This chapter has a section dedicated to relations between the Syrian Lordships and Allied Turkish Armies up to 1128.
Chapter III is "Frankish-Muslim Relations in the Period of Nur al-Din and Saladin (1158-92)."
Chapter IV deals more with Frankish-Muslim legal relations.
While only four chapters might seem like a superficial survey, this book actually weighs in at over 360 pages. Chapter I can be found on Academia while the entire book is available from Amazon and Brill for $193.00. Interestingly enough, Brill also offers an e-book for only $197.00.