Suggestions for Improvements

Field of Glory II is a turn-based tactical game set during the Rise of Rome from 280 BC to 25 BC.
SLancaster
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 3:42 pm

Suggestions for Improvements

Post by SLancaster » Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:41 pm

Great game but a number of things bug me a bit. I have mentioned a few before but will put everything in a list now!

1. Camera

The camera is a real annoyance for me. Units will sometimes fight in the corner of my screen and then it moves on before I know what has happened. I am using the little casualty box trick but it doesn’t really work completely. All skirmisher attacks are still happening all over the place.

I think something similar happened in Sanctus Reach and a few patches sorted it out. All we need is the camera to zoom over to a unit that is fighting. Have the option at least for a ‘dynamic camera’ or whatever you want to call it.

2.Flags

At least have some more detail on the flags. The figures are nice to look at but let down by plain red or blue flags.

3. Random Battle PBEM Title

In my email it just says ‘Random Battle’. I would like it to state the armies involved so I know which game it is. Obviously, in ‘Epic Battles’ you don’t have this problem because it names the battle.

4. In-game Messages

I don’t want to see messages before I take my turn on the battlefield. In really close battles I sometimes see a message that says “Well done hard luck” or something before I have taken my turn.

I think those are the main things in my mind right now..

rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 20593
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by rbodleyscott » Fri Oct 12, 2018 7:40 am

Thanks

1. Camera
The camera is a real annoyance for me. Units will sometimes fight in the corner of my screen and then it moves on before I know what has happened. I am using the little casualty box trick but it doesn’t really work completely. All skirmisher attacks are still happening all over the place.

I think something similar happened in Sanctus Reach and a few patches sorted it out. All we need is the camera to zoom over to a unit that is fighting. Have the option at least for a ‘dynamic camera’ or whatever you want to call it.
The problem is that others find the camera jumping all over the place equally annoying. We could look into adding it as an option.
2.Flags

At least have some more detail on the flags. The figures are nice to look at but let down by plain red or blue flags.
As Pat the artist and UI designer has posted elsewhere, this was to make the vital status information that the flags convey easier to read. The flags are primarily there to convey this information, not decorative. In early beta iterations people found the status information hard to spot.
3. Random Battle PBEM Title

In my email it just says ‘Random Battle’. I would like it to state the armies involved so I know which game it is. Obviously, in ‘Epic Battles’ you don’t have this problem because it names the battle.

4. In-game Messages

I don’t want to see messages before I take my turn on the battlefield. In really close battles I sometimes see a message that says “Well done hard luck” or something before I have taken my turn.
These are both on the wish list.
Richard Bodley Scott

Image

SLancaster
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by SLancaster » Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:01 am

Great. You are doing a fine job. This game has really brought wargaming back on to the PC...

lapdog666
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Sergeant - 7.5 cm FK 16 nA
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2016 1:25 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by lapdog666 » Sat Oct 13, 2018 1:40 pm

i wish i could have full control over camera during the resolution phase

Jagger2002
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 7:31 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by Jagger2002 » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:09 pm

In custom battles, I would like to be able to select the composition of the AI army and then let the AI take over.

rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 20593
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by rbodleyscott » Sun Oct 14, 2018 7:29 am

lapdog666 wrote:
Sat Oct 13, 2018 1:40 pm
i wish i could have full control over camera during the resolution phase
Not sure what you mean by this. Do you mean you don't want it to move automatically at all?

You can drag the map by holding down the L mouse button if you want to force it to move to a particular place.
Richard Bodley Scott

Image

rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 20593
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by rbodleyscott » Sun Oct 14, 2018 7:30 am

Jagger2002 wrote:
Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:09 pm
In custom battles, I would like to be able to select the composition of the AI army and then let the AI take over.
We will look at whether this could be feasible.
Richard Bodley Scott

Image

Searry
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:53 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by Searry » Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:13 pm

I would love to get rid off any automatic camera movement as well.

stockwellpete
Field of Glory Moderator
Field of Glory Moderator
Posts: 7795
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 2:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by stockwellpete » Sun Oct 14, 2018 1:56 pm

rbodleyscott wrote:
Sun Oct 14, 2018 7:30 am
Jagger2002 wrote:
Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:09 pm
In custom battles, I would like to be able to select the composition of the AI army and then let the AI take over.
We will look at whether this could be feasible.
Yes, this would be a very good additional feature, if it is possible.

Paul59
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Posts: 1257
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 11:26 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by Paul59 » Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:09 pm

Searry wrote:
Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:13 pm
I would love to get rid off any automatic camera movement as well.
I don't understand how that would work.

You can already turn on Close Combat Reports (either Simple or Detailed), and that will pause the game until you want the AI turn to continue. Did you want more than that?

Searry
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:53 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by Searry » Sun Oct 14, 2018 6:28 pm

Paul59 wrote:
Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:09 pm
Searry wrote:
Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:13 pm
I would love to get rid off any automatic camera movement as well.
I don't understand how that would work.

You can already turn on Close Combat Reports (either Simple or Detailed), and that will pause the game until you want the AI turn to continue. Did you want more than that?
What I mean is simply no automatic camera movement. Let the automatic combat phase go on as it is but stop the camera from "jumping".

I don't have close combat reports on, I use detailed tooltip.

Paul59
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Posts: 1257
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 11:26 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by Paul59 » Sun Oct 14, 2018 7:43 pm

Searry wrote:
Sun Oct 14, 2018 6:28 pm
Paul59 wrote:
Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:09 pm
Searry wrote:
Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:13 pm
I would love to get rid off any automatic camera movement as well.
I don't understand how that would work.

You can already turn on Close Combat Reports (either Simple or Detailed), and that will pause the game until you want the AI turn to continue. Did you want more than that?
What I mean is simply no automatic camera movement. Let the automatic combat phase go on as it is but stop the camera from "jumping".

I don't have close combat reports on, I use detailed tooltip.
But if the camera does not move action will be going on "off screen", or do you want a big panoramic view of the battlefield? Either way, you will have a hard job working out what is going on!

Searry
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:53 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by Searry » Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:25 pm

Paul59 wrote:
Sun Oct 14, 2018 7:43 pm
Searry wrote:
Sun Oct 14, 2018 6:28 pm
Paul59 wrote:
Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:09 pm


I don't understand how that would work.

You can already turn on Close Combat Reports (either Simple or Detailed), and that will pause the game until you want the AI turn to continue. Did you want more than that?
What I mean is simply no automatic camera movement. Let the automatic combat phase go on as it is but stop the camera from "jumping".

I don't have close combat reports on, I use detailed tooltip.
But if the camera does not move action will be going on "off screen", or do you want a big panoramic view of the battlefield? Either way, you will have a hard job working out what is going on!
I disagree. I personally think battles are quite predictable often.

SLancaster
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by SLancaster » Tue Oct 16, 2018 9:28 am

5. Larger armies

In reply to Pete mentioning in another thread that some players didn’t seem to stick with the game I think larger armies would be one attraction. In Sanctus Reach you can play 2000 point games, 5000 point games and go all the way up to 10000 point games. I actually prefer the smaller battles but some players really enjoy large battles. Having it as an option might be welcome.

6. Co-op Battles

In addition to larger battles being able to play with a friend would be really fun... just some ideas.

ggarynorman
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Senior Corporal - Destroyer
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 7:37 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by ggarynorman » Mon Oct 22, 2018 8:53 pm

The ability to chose a banner colour as a default for all battles . I easily get confused with multiple matches with multiple banner colours

rbodleyscott
Field of Glory 2
Field of Glory 2
Posts: 20593
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:25 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by rbodleyscott » Tue Oct 23, 2018 7:04 am

Thanks for all the suggestions. We do take note.
Richard Bodley Scott

Image

shawkhan2
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Staff Sergeant - Kavallerie
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:03 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by shawkhan2 » Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:59 pm

In cases where both sides use some of the same units it would be nice if there was some indication of which side a routed unit belongs to. Perhaps a colored corner on the banner?

Paul59
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Lieutenant Colonel - Panther D
Posts: 1257
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 11:26 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by Paul59 » Wed Oct 24, 2018 4:25 pm

shawkhan2 wrote:
Wed Oct 24, 2018 3:59 pm
In cases where both sides use some of the same units it would be nice if there was some indication of which side a routed unit belongs to. Perhaps a colored corner on the banner?
There already is. If you look closely the cross pole of the routed banner is in the side colour.

antiochosvii
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Lance Corporal - SdKfz 222
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 6:53 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by antiochosvii » Mon Oct 29, 2018 8:39 pm

While previous campaign improvements regarding additional army lists as enemies/allies have been welcome, it's still not enough imo.

Why on earth can we not select a series of enemies to face in a campaign? It would just make immersion so very much easier to achieve. I want to play as Syracuse and fight mostly Romans but also the Etruscans and Gauls -- and it would be nice to be able to have a little more control over that.

Jagger2002
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Senior Corporal - Ju 87G
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 7:31 pm

Re: Suggestions for Improvements

Post by Jagger2002 » Wed Oct 31, 2018 3:53 am

When a multi-player game ends, only one player can send a message to the other. It would be nice for the other player to be able to send a message back within the system.

Post Reply

Return to “Field of Glory II”