Army List 2 Errors

[shadowdragon]

Just got the book today. A quick glance through but I did notice a couple of errors

1) Foederate Roman, page 54, Equites Mauri: there’s no min-max. Could be anything from 0-4 to 0-12.

2) Carolingian Frankish, page 97, Imperial Retainers and Frankish “Horse Archers”: the maxima total bases for the individual types (0-4 for elite retainers, 0-12 for superior retainers, 0-4 Frankish horse archers) are less than the maximum for total bases for all three types (0-24).

[philqw78]

They are superior Impact Foot - Heavy Weapon in the Dacian list

They are just superior Heavy Weapon in the Pontic list. Why?

[terrys]

1) Foederate Roman, page 54, Equites Mauri: there’s no min-max. Could be anything from 0-4 to 0-12.

The empty entry should be merged with the one above (i.i. total number of bases for "Equites Sagittarii" and Equites Mauri" combined should be "0-8")

2) Carolingian Frankish, page 97, Imperial Retainers and Frankish “Horse Archers”: the maxima total bases for the individual types (0-4 for elite retainers, 0-12 for superior retainers, 0-4 Frankish horse archers) are less than the maximum for total bases for all three types (0-24).

I'll change the max bases to 0-20 when I post the errata.

They are superior Impact Foot - Heavy Weapon in the Dacian list
They are just superior Heavy Weapon in the Pontic list. Why?

We couldn't find any evidence that they were particularly ferocious when fighting for the Pontics.

[philqw78]

They are superior Impact Foot - Heavy Weapon in the Dacian list
They are just superior Heavy Weapon in the Pontic list. Why?

We couldn't find any evidence that they were particularly ferocious when fighting for the Pontics.

So why are they superior?

[terrys]

So why are they superior?

Because they're good! - Just not crazy

[philqw78]