Caracole III - Results Thread Round 2

[pantherboy]

Recording Results

Please use this thread to detail results and provide battle reports to whatever extent you desire. Below you will find how scoring is to be calculated and the way to report the results.

Scoring

Scoring will be based upon the break level and by how close the battle was. The narrower the margin between players will result in scores rather close while an early decisive win will be wider.

Win: 6.0 + (enemy break% - winner break %)/10
Draw or Loss: (enemy break %)/10

Example:
pantherboy (German Catholic 1632-1638) (61%) vs flatsix518 (Swedish 1630-1634) (48%)
pantherboy (48%)/10 = 4.8pts
flatsix518 6.0 + (61% - 48%)/10 = 7.3pts

NB: Any battle that ends due to all the turns elapsing and with a player ahead in break % will not be considered a win and as such will only score the opponents break level divided by 10.

Reporting Results

Reporting results will be incumbent on the player who won the battle. They will be required to log into the Slitherine Forum and post the result publically on the appropriate thread (e.g. Caracole III Results). Results posted should be reported in the following format;

Group (A/B/C etc.)
Player ID (army) (Army Break %) score vs Player ID (army) (Army Break %) score

Example:
Group A
pantherboy (German Catholic 1632-1638) (61%) 4.8pts vs flatsix518 (Swedish 1630-1634) (48%) 7.3pts

[rbodleyscott]

Group A Round 2 result:

rbodleyscott (Swiss 1494-1515) (15%) (9.3) won vs youngr (French 1494-1525) (48%) (1.5)

[rbodleyscott]

Group A Round 2 Result:

rbodleyscott (Transylvanian 1618-1632) (54%) (7.0) won vs batesmotel (Catholic League 1619-1632) (64%) (5.4)

Very fun, nail-biting game. Thanks.

[ulysisgrunt]

A very, very, close victory...
Only the stubbornness of the Scot's foot and two small exile cavalier units won the game.
Ulysisgrunt victory (Scots) Loss 53%; score 6.1 (?)

W_Michael loss (Parliament) loss 60%; score 5.3

Danny Weitz

[awesum4]

Group A result;

awesum4 Imperials 1619-1632 8% 9.6 points won against youngr Danish 1625-1629 42% 0.8 points.

His massed Cuirassiers failed against massed tercios

[cavehobbit]

Group C results

Cavehobbit (Swiss 1494-1515) (13%) (10.9) won vs Doyley50 (French 1494-1525) (62%) (1.3)

Cavehobbit (French 1494-1525) (17%) (9.2) won vs Doyley50 (Swiss 1494-1515) (49%) (1.7)

My first win in Italian wars battles, I think The results does not fully reflect what happened in the battles. The fightings were very tough, but in the end my tactics worked. Thanks for two good games!

[youngr]

Group A Round 2 result:

youngr (Swiss 1494-1515) (4%) (10.7) won vs rbodleyscott (French 1494-1525) (51%) (0.4)

[rbodleyscott]

Group A Round 2 Result:

rbodleyscott (English 1604-1622) (43%) (7.9) won vs awesum4 (Austrian 1610-1617) (62%) (4.3)

[awesum4]

Group A Round 2;

awesum4 ((French 1494-1525) (17%) (9.0) won over batesmotel (Swiss 1494-1515) (47%) (1.7)

[rbodleyscott]

Group A:

rbodleyscott (Edgehill Royalist 1642) (17%) (8.8 ) won vs Aryaman (Parliament 1642-1643) (45%) (1.7)

[rbodleyscott]

Group A:

rbodleyscott (Scots Covenanters 47%) 7.5 won vs pantherboy (New Model Army 62%) 4.7

[pantherboy]

Group A:

pantherboy (Edgehill Royalist 1642) (4%) (10.2) won vs awesum4 (Parliament 1642-1643) (46%) (0.4)

[cavehobbit]

Group C result

Cavehobbit (Scots Covenanter 1648-1652) (25%) (9.1) won vs deadtorius (NMA 1646-1660) (56%) (2.5)

The Parliamentarian cavalry crushed my left flank, but luckily for me my Scot infantry routed nearly all Parliamentarian infantry. Thanks for a good game!

[youngr]

Group A result;

youngr Imperials 1619-1632 (53%) 7.2 points won against awesum4 Danish 1625-1629 (65%) 5.3 points.

A close hard fought game!

[deadtorius]

Group C
In an I can't believe it finish deadtorius Imperials (0%) 15.3 pts wins versus Doyle50 English (93%) 6 pts

Not sure how but I managed to build a much larger army which just rolled forward and engaged the English army. I was able to destroy the entire English Army, almost, starting with the cavalry and then the last horse and the infantry all collapsed in one turn. I am just as suprised as Doyle was on this one. I doubt I will ever see results like this again, but I guess it makes Caracole history

Thank you for the game Doyle50, you fought well but were just too far outnumbered. Perhaps you will have better luck in our other game.

[rbodleyscott]

Group C
In an I can't believe it finish deadtorius Imperials (0%) 15.3 pts wins versus Doyle50 English (93%) 6 pts

That would be 0 points to the English.

[batesmotel]

Group A

batesmotel (Catholic League) 39% - 8.7 beat Pantherboy (Danish) 66% 3.9

Thanks for the game.

Chris

[cavehobbit]

Group C result

Cavehobbit (Danish 1625-1629) (44%) (8.2) won vs iandavidsmith (Imperial 1619-1632) (66%) (4.4)

Thanks for a great game! The Imperial was unlucky to have some of their units arriving as a flank attack, so the Imperials were outnumbered at the start and couldn't fully counter the Danish advance. But the Imperials fought very well and at one point caused some panic among the Danish. In the end the Danish succeeded in routing most of the Imperial infantry.

[majandro]

Group B

Majandro (Danish 1625-1629) (41%) (8.3) beat Ulysisgrunt (Imperial 1619-1632) (64%) (4.1)

Well played Ulysisgrunt.

Regards.

[pantherboy]

Group A Round 2 Result:

pantherboy (Transylvanian 1618-1632) (0%) (10.5) won vs youngr (Catholic League 1619-1632) (45%) (0.0)