why 2 years per turn? doesnt that mean your characters will die too fast? besides army could move quite a distance in two years, while here it looks like you only move to neighboring province is kinda strange... it was one of the big mistakes Creative Assembly did with Rome 2 Total War, so its kinda...

wow, thanks! all great changes, cant wait to play it!

Personally, i think Spitfire MkV is modeled quite underwhelmingly.. it was superior to all german fighters up till FW-190A appeared.. yet you have literally no problems facing these..

yeah, Tiger II roaming the fields like nothing is very strange... they actually got quite a range in PC...Realistically, they were unable to move on their own more than 40km... same with Panthers.. they were always loaded on train if they needed to move at longer distances.. yet in game, you have no...

i think you could rename unit slots to supply slots or something.. .as you describe it, it represents army overall capacity to sustain units, therefore i think the best solution would be give these units some "sustainability" value and give army a max value that will get increased over tim...

definitely about gameplay changes compared to Panzer Corps 1.. any changes and reasons behind the change.

what about the overall gameplay? PzC felt more like a puzzle game than strategy game to some degree, are there gonna be changes in that regard? Also, what about the artillery? Is there gonna be counter-battery fire implemented vs artillery support? (i mean in reality, artillery had limited amount of...

Personally, i think the biggest problem with 3D is the matter of perspective... some units are way too big (infantry units composed of three figures) while others are extremely small (battleships).. plus add terrain features, flat cities etc and overall it doesnt look anyhow better than good old Pan...

95% of PanzerGrenadier units used ordinary trucks only... no halftracks whatsoever, let alone those fancy ones with howitzers or PaKs..

just FYI - Grenadiers did not carry grenades during Napoleonic era... those were long gone as were found problematic... Grenadiers were instead, recruited from tallest and strongest recruits, therefore were especially effective in bayonet charges.. Tall men has an advantage of further reach (longer ...

strongpoints and forts should be "soft" targets, so tanks with high velocity guns wont be more effective than specialized bunker buster tanks with large caliber guns.. so, now if you change them to soft target, their close defense needs to go up, otherwise infantry will slaughter them with...

I think they are a bit modeled strangely.. Strongpoint is supposed to be light fortification, which main role was to stop enemy infantry, but its the infantry which is most effective destroying it, while tanks, which were the bane of such positions, end up coming up short when attacking these... The...

thing is, those were not really upgrades but new planes.. FW190 had plethora of improvements over its life span. but only few significant. but of course, they are missing in base Panzer Corps.. FW190 should start with A-1, then get A-4 and A-8 as top version. (F-3 was practically variant of A-4 with...

trucks were easier to be destroyed from strafing, but were still small target to rockets with their minuscule chance to hit. they had to rely on "splash" damage..large bombs were effective due to fragmentation to relatively large area, anyway bomb effectivity was not high in ww2.. CEP in t...

there is one elegant solution for tactical bomber situation even now - instead of changing their type to 9, they could be switchable units with clone being 9... so player could decide if he wants to use his tactical bombers to attack the unit directly, or switch to "strategic role" and ins...

I tend agree with that, tactical bombers could damage ammo, fuel and cause long lasting suppression as well, but it cannot be modded and thus we have to accept the present situation in which they cause direct damage to unit strength (which is an abstract idea anyway and can be interpreted as the ov...

I know well that unit size is not just battalion size, but battalion size is the maximum size that makes sense with this game design... Division size is just no go because of all different unit types present in division, which are separate in the game... So, to keep the game design intact, minimum s...

So, when i destroyed your argument about "hidden" supporting units within single unit you come back with this???? Battalion size units are only scale that somewhat makes sense with style of gameplay of this game.. NOTHING ELSE would fit anyhow.. yet, its not that important.. IMPORTANT is, ...

and i keep explaining that those stats don't cover any supporting units.. plus, from reality perspective, those supporting units were part of DIVISION, not battalion, not company structure... so, If single unit is supposed to represent a Division, then entire design is wrong - German tank divisions ...

again - If supporting units are integral part of the unit, then IT NEEDS to have stats coresponding it... THEREFORE it needs to get AA values corresponding to integral AAA guns, it has to have more ammo and fuel than what is extrapolated from actual tank ammo load and fuel capacity/ combat range... ...