Division A Challenges up shawkhan2's Lysumachids vs Klayeckles' Achaemenid Persians(419-329BC) and Ludendorf's Seleucids(300-206BC)
PW=khan
Thanks Guys
Search found 339 matches
- Fri Oct 19, 2018 3:14 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
- Thu Oct 18, 2018 1:44 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here
Division A
shawkhan2's Superb Sassanid Persians(591=628AD) challenge pantherboy's pitiful Pictish(477-850AD) PW=khan
(Talk about your hubris!)
shawkhan2's Superb Sassanid Persians(591=628AD) challenge pantherboy's pitiful Pictish(477-850AD) PW=khan
(Talk about your hubris!)
- Thu Oct 18, 2018 1:39 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here
Division A
shawkhan2's Sassanid Persians beat DzonVejn's Lombards 42%/12%
Cavalry armies are grist for the mill of elephants in this game.
shawkhan2's Sassanid Persians beat DzonVejn's Lombards 42%/12%
Cavalry armies are grist for the mill of elephants in this game.
- Tue Oct 16, 2018 4:52 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here
Division A'
Shawkhan2's Sassanid Persians beat the city Arabs of Nijis 58% to 30%
Shawkhan2's Sassanid Persians beat the city Arabs of Nijis 58% to 30%
- Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here
Division A
shawkhan2's Sassanid Persians(591-628AD) challenge Gorrick's Byzantine(579-599AD) and Nijis' City Arabs(300-633AD) PW=khan
shawkhan2's Sassanid Persians(591-628AD) challenge Gorrick's Byzantine(579-599AD) and Nijis' City Arabs(300-633AD) PW=khan
- Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:38 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
Re: Late Antiquity: arrange your matches here
Division A
shawkhan2's Sassanids(477-590AD) challenge dkalenda's Ptolemaic(55-30BC) PW-khan
shawkhan2's Sassanids(477-590AD) challenge dkalenda's Ptolemaic(55-30BC) PW-khan
- Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:36 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here
Division A
shawkhan2's Lysimachid's challenge hidde's Gallic 300-101BC PW=khan
shawkhan2's Lysimachid's challenge hidde's Gallic 300-101BC PW=khan
- Thu Sep 20, 2018 1:42 pm
- Forum: Panzer Corps
- Topic: Best Infantry Unit
- Replies: 62
- Views: 21958
Re: Best Infantry Unit
The best infantry unit depends on the map terrain and placement of objectives. On maps with good road networks Wehr infantry on trucks work fine. When there is an objective far away and hard to reach FSJs may be a solution. When you are playing against minefields and strongpoints it is nice to have ...
- Thu Sep 20, 2018 1:22 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Any chance for real new gameplay features (not just new units) in the future ?
- Replies: 85
- Views: 13392
Re: Any chance for real new gameplay features (not just new units) in the future ?
I think the LOS rules are much too generous in this game as it is. Many of Hannibal's ambush stratagems are completely unworkable in this system. One reason that generals liked to ride was that they could see over their own troops. Horse should have a longer LOS than foot. I think that enemy troops ...
- Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:52 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
Re: Recruitment for Late Antiquity is now open!
I am in.
1. Sassanid Persians (477-590AD)
2. Jewish Revolt(66-135AD)
3. Arab(city)300-636AD
4. Ptolemaic(55-30BC)
1. Sassanid Persians (477-590AD)
2. Jewish Revolt(66-135AD)
3. Arab(city)300-636AD
4. Ptolemaic(55-30BC)
- Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:51 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
Re: Recruitment for Classical Antiquity is now open!
I am in.
1.Lysimachid (320-281BC)
2.Macedonian(320-261BC)
3.Thracians(250BC-46AD)
4.Romans(105-25BC)
1.Lysimachid (320-281BC)
2.Macedonian(320-261BC)
3.Thracians(250BC-46AD)
4.Romans(105-25BC)
- Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:50 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
Re: Recruitment for Early Middle Ages is now open!
I am in.
1. Sassanid Persians(591-628AD)
2. Indians(546-599AD)
3. Arabs(City)300-636AD
4.Romano-British(407-599AD)
1. Sassanid Persians(591-628AD)
2. Indians(546-599AD)
3. Arabs(City)300-636AD
4.Romano-British(407-599AD)
- Fri Sep 07, 2018 1:53 am
- Forum: Panzer Corps
- Topic: Upgrade Questions
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3233
Re: Upgrade Questions
Getting around the slot limitations, some people like to count infantry as regiments and everything else as battalions.
- Wed Sep 05, 2018 1:28 pm
- Forum: Panzer Corps
- Topic: Me.109E vs. 109F
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2519
Re: Me.109E vs. 109F
With the higher initiative, the F will fire first. Should not take as much damage in Ftr vs Ftr combat.
The E should be somewhat better against bombers
The E should be somewhat better against bombers
- Sat Sep 01, 2018 6:55 pm
- Forum: Panzer Corps
- Topic: Building a historically authentic core/corps
- Replies: 62
- Views: 38538
Re: Building a historically authentic core/corps
The main problem with an historically authentic core is that your opponents in the game will Not be historically authentic but quite ridiculously overpowered.
- Mon Aug 27, 2018 6:19 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II
- Topic: Game play decision to base victory on rout % vs. objectives
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4151
Re: Game play decision to base victory on rout % vs. objectives
I think the generated battlefields are the main problem. Opposing generals would generally choose a battlefield where one or the other side would not be overwhelmingly favored by the terrain.
- Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:56 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
Re: Enemies of Rome: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
Shawkhan's Romans had a draw with Breogan's German Horse Tribes. 52% to his losses of 57%. Just could not catch the last unit.
Shawkhan's Romans had a draw with Breogan's German Horse Tribes. 52% to his losses of 57%. Just could not catch the last unit.
- Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:22 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Rally Point (discussion and questions)
- Replies: 1924
- Views: 204583
Re: Indicative poll for the FOG2DL
Personally, I see little reason not to just go with Slitherine's tournament scoring system, Option 4 approximates that effect better than any of the other options.
- Sun Aug 05, 2018 2:45 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your result here . . .
Division B
Shawkhan2's Macedonians had a drawn battle with markwatson360's Parthians.
A totally ridiculous battlefield, huge hills filled with rough terrain made it impossible to come to grips with the Parthians, who refused to engage.
Shawkhan2's Macedonians had a drawn battle with markwatson360's Parthians.
A totally ridiculous battlefield, huge hills filled with rough terrain made it impossible to come to grips with the Parthians, who refused to engage.
- Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:40 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory II Digital League
- Topic: The Dustbin
- Replies: 27272
- Views: 1722794
Re: Enemies of Rome: winners post your results here . . .
Division A
Shawkhan2's Western Huns harried Gorrick's Romans to a 5% to 40% result. The Huns successfully made themselves a bloody nuisance.
Shawkhan2's Western Huns harried Gorrick's Romans to a 5% to 40% result. The Huns successfully made themselves a bloody nuisance.