Search found 75 matches
- Tue Dec 09, 2014 7:45 pm
- Forum: Warhammer® 40,000® Armageddon™
- Topic: Difficulty curve and unit tactical value trouble.
- Replies: 74
- Views: 17342
Re: Difficulty curve and unit tactical value trouble.
The balance problem between units is not a problem of this game, it's a direct consequence of being too faithfull to the tabletop game. Personally I think that big armored units - titans are OP as a sales strategy of GW, sadly that translated to this game. Gargants and titan should be EXTREMELY RARE...
- Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:37 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Swords & Sorcery : General Discussion
- Topic: Monster...a new trooptype.
- Replies: 14
- Views: 15433
Re: Monster...a new trooptype.
with the new elephant rules in V 2.0 monsters would work even better.
- Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:39 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Swords & Sorcery : General Discussion
- Topic: Using GW's LOTR minatures...
- Replies: 11
- Views: 12669
You should be thinking in UNITS instead of bases. A 2 base width unit has a frontage of 120 mm. So you can fit 3 cavalry models there (with your current basing system) And between 5 and 6 infantry (with 25mm or 20 mm basing). SO if you limit yourself and your opponents to 2 or 4 base width units for...
- Thu Oct 07, 2010 7:36 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Swords & Sorcery : General Discussion
- Topic: Dwarf army adaptation
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3838
- Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:54 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: About Mobs and Medium Foot
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3776
- Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:17 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: About Mobs and Medium Foot
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3776
- Mon Oct 04, 2010 3:14 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: About Mobs and Medium Foot
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3776
- Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:20 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: About Mobs and Medium Foot
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3776
i am not proposing a base change. Making them fight like LF is maybe too much, but making them fight as permanently disordered maybe be in the middle. If you think that mobs are not necesarely fanatical then maybe they could have a price reduction or get quality improvement for free. (poor mobs then...
- Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:50 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: About Mobs and Medium Foot
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3776
The base price is the same, the quality and grade of protections are the same, same with the options to weapons, so, besides the aesthetical factor there are no other difference. I was thinking that maybe MOBs could be treated as being permanently disordered with a cost reduction or keeping the cost...
- Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:27 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: About Mobs and Medium Foot
- Replies: 34
- Views: 3776
About Mobs and Medium Foot
Recently in a topic in the "Fantasy" section i posted a list where i classified some troops (chaos beast men from Warhmyouknowwhat) as MOB. Somebody said there that I should clasified them as MF but i argue that if a herd of beastmen is not by its nature the very definition of MOB i do not...
- Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:16 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on the FoG 2.0 debates....
- Replies: 35
- Views: 4123
- Fri Oct 01, 2010 3:36 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Thoughts on the FoG 2.0 debates....
- Replies: 35
- Views: 4123
Re: Thoughts on the FoG 2.0 debates....
I’ve had a fascination with the apparent avalanche of flaws to FoG that need fixing. I must confess that I have a suspicion that a large chunk of the recent avalanche is actually trolling :? I don´t think there is an avalanche neither trolling. There have been several discussions about particular t...
- Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:08 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Cohesion Tests
- Replies: 42
- Views: 4585
- Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:00 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Save the elephant
- Replies: 180
- Views: 17172
- Tue Sep 28, 2010 11:31 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Save the elephant
- Replies: 180
- Views: 17172
If you make them less likely to dye you should also consider than more than often they tended to panic and trample their own troos. I game terms i would have preferred a tougher elephant too (although i dont run any army with them) but also the possibility of panicking them and disordering their own...
- Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:19 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Autobreak levels
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2567
- Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:14 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Cohesion Tests
- Replies: 42
- Views: 4585
You have responded yourself Dave. You havent seen a 12 bases BG in ages because they are too fragile and not worth taken. If the change improves variety in the army lists seen it is good to the game and at a minimal cost. Sometimes i feel reading responses about propossed changesabout improving low ...
- Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:14 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Cohesion Tests
- Replies: 42
- Views: 4585
I think there is a depth bonus implicit in this suggested change as DavidT said: While on this topic, currently we have: -1 for 1HP2B from shooting -1 for 1HP3B from hand to hand I would like this to be changed to: -1 for 1HP2B from both shooting and hand to hand. This is consistent and also improve...
- Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:37 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Cohesion Tests
- Replies: 42
- Views: 4585
I think you are missing a point Nick. The failure can be due to other factors, as the enemy overlapping or flanking the deeper formations, the disorder in extra deep formations preventing it from gaining it´s suposed advantage and simply bad luck. All of this factor already exist in FoG, why don´t g...
- Mon Sep 27, 2010 4:08 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Cohesion Tests
- Replies: 42
- Views: 4585