Yes JJ, that is it.JJMicromegas wrote:One other point of clarification; when the rules state set up as per normal FoGN rules, I am assuming they mean the defender deploys three units first and then the attacker and so on?
Search found 11 matches
- Wed Sep 03, 2014 10:28 am
- Forum: Tournaments, Demos & Opponents
- Topic: July 2014 FOG N tournament Melbourne
- Replies: 54
- Views: 11023
Re: July 2014 FOG N tournament Melbourne
- Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:53 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Field of Glory 2.0.4 reader available!
- Replies: 41
- Views: 32279
Re: Field of Glory 2.0.4 reader available!
Hmmm, late last night it suddenly worked fine. Cheers
- Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:41 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
- Topic: Field of Glory 2.0.4 reader available!
- Replies: 41
- Views: 32279
Re: Field of Glory 2.0.4 reader available!
Trying to download the new 2.0.4 reader from the link at start of thread - but it keeps linking to some 'GFACE' launcher. huh??????????????
PC Version
PC Version
- Thu Jan 30, 2014 2:53 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Squares n Stuff
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1236
Re: Squares n Stuff
Here is what we are playing in an up-coming FOG N Competition i beleive it is correct. Hmmm...realy need clrification on below. 1. For Shooting: (a) Squares cannot give support in shooting Hmmm...Terry stated "A square can both give and receive flank supporting fire" (b) Squares can recei...
- Mon Jan 27, 2014 4:44 am
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Squares n Stuff
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1236
Squares n Stuff
Hi, I initially posted in an old thread on squares but have since gone through all aspects of squares with below notes - can we get comment on some of the ambiguities? What faces does a square have? • http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=188&t=35442&p=333737&hilit=A+square+has...
- Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:19 pm
- Forum: Rules Questions
- Topic: Squares and support
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2671
Re: Squares and support
This debate has recently been rekindled so looking for clarification. [quote="BrettPTIn combat: ....... 3. squares cannot give flank support to other units (they have no flank) ......[/quote] All the other points seem fair enough but this one I'd love to hear expansion on. I'd have thought a sq...
- Sun Jun 30, 2013 10:55 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Yet Another Min/Max Querry
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2037
Re: Yet Another Min/Max Querry
ok, the more I know bout these lists the less it seems I understand :oops: . 1814 French Cav Corp. I am attaching a single Division to an Infantry Corp, so..... Chasseurs/Light Cavalry.....Min 8 bases makes for 1 compulsory small unit in the single division. Dragoons....................Min 18 bases ...
- Tue Jun 25, 2013 2:30 am
- Forum: Army Design
- Topic: Yet Another Min/Max Querry
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2037
Yet Another Min/Max Querry
Hi, Min/Max for a single Div from another list for attachment I think I get.........except for Attachments. Taking for example French 1814 Cav Corp. List allows: Upto 2 Officers per Division, 3 in total. Up to 2 Artillery in total. So for my single Cav Division to attach to my 1814 Inf Corp, can I t...
- Sun Jun 09, 2013 10:44 pm
- Forum: Field of Glory : Napoleonic Era 1792-1815 : General Discussion
- Topic: 1700 to 1762
- Replies: 89
- Views: 34840
Re: 1700 to 1762
We have obviously not play enough games to resolve all problems. But what we have founded yet is that the only important rule change for the SYW is to suppress the -1 dice for being in extended line. Without this (and without skirmishes or battalion guns) extended line is the best formation for reg...
- Wed May 22, 2013 11:33 am
- Forum: Campaigns
- Topic: Campaign to Tabletop, Rules?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2674
Campaign to Tabletop, Rules?
So...what rules are people using to convert things like campaign attrition, fatigue, losses from earlier battles etc etc onto the tabletop?
eg a Division has taken 20% losses in a previous battle....how to represent this on the tabletop for the next?
eg a Division has taken 20% losses in a previous battle....how to represent this on the tabletop for the next?
- Mon May 20, 2013 3:04 am
- Forum: Field of Glory : Napoleonic Era 1792-1815 : General Discussion
- Topic: 1700 to 1762
- Replies: 89
- Views: 34840
Re: 1700 to 1762
The basic units should be regiment level even maybe batallion, there were no divisions, quality of Army leaders should not be as generic as in FOGN (to many exceptional leaders in my view). Batalion guns, some units had them others not. Skirmishers/croats/light inf functioned differently. Can't agr...