Search found 11 matches

by hos459
Wed Sep 03, 2014 10:28 am
Forum: Tournaments, Demos & Opponents
Topic: July 2014 FOG N tournament Melbourne
Replies: 54
Views: 5727

Re: July 2014 FOG N tournament Melbourne

JJMicromegas wrote:One other point of clarification; when the rules state set up as per normal FoGN rules, I am assuming they mean the defender deploys three units first and then the attacker and so on?
Yes JJ, that is it.
by hos459
Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:53 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
Topic: Field of Glory 2.0.4 reader available!
Replies: 41
Views: 24493

Re: Field of Glory 2.0.4 reader available!

Hmmm, late last night it suddenly worked fine. Cheers
by hos459
Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:41 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Ancient & Medieval Era 3000 BC-1500 AD : General Discussion
Topic: Field of Glory 2.0.4 reader available!
Replies: 41
Views: 24493

Re: Field of Glory 2.0.4 reader available!

Trying to download the new 2.0.4 reader from the link at start of thread - but it keeps linking to some 'GFACE' launcher. huh??????????????

PC Version
by hos459
Thu Jan 30, 2014 2:53 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Squares n Stuff
Replies: 5
Views: 469

Re: Squares n Stuff

Here is what we are playing in an up-coming FOG N Competition i beleive it is correct. Hmmm...realy need clrification on below. 1. For Shooting: (a) Squares cannot give support in shooting Hmmm...Terry stated "A square can both give and receive flank supporting fire" (b) Squares can receive flank s...
by hos459
Mon Jan 27, 2014 4:44 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Squares n Stuff
Replies: 5
Views: 469

Squares n Stuff

Hi, I initially posted in an old thread on squares but have since gone through all aspects of squares with below notes - can we get comment on some of the ambiguities? What faces does a square have? • http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=188&t=35442&p=333737&hilit=A+square+has+no+rear#p33...
by hos459
Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:19 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Squares and support
Replies: 8
Views: 1430

Re: Squares and support

This debate has recently been rekindled so looking for clarification. [quote="BrettPTIn combat: ....... 3. squares cannot give flank support to other units (they have no flank) ......[/quote] All the other points seem fair enough but this one I'd love to hear expansion on. I'd have thought a square ...
by hos459
Sun Jun 30, 2013 10:55 am
Forum: Army Design
Topic: Yet Another Min/Max Querry
Replies: 9
Views: 790

Re: Yet Another Min/Max Querry

ok, the more I know bout these lists the less it seems I understand :oops: . 1814 French Cav Corp. I am attaching a single Division to an Infantry Corp, so..... Chasseurs/Light Cavalry.....Min 8 bases makes for 1 compulsory small unit in the single division. Dragoons....................Min 18 bases ...
by hos459
Tue Jun 25, 2013 2:30 am
Forum: Army Design
Topic: Yet Another Min/Max Querry
Replies: 9
Views: 790

Yet Another Min/Max Querry

Hi, Min/Max for a single Div from another list for attachment I think I get.........except for Attachments. Taking for example French 1814 Cav Corp. List allows: Upto 2 Officers per Division, 3 in total. Up to 2 Artillery in total. So for my single Cav Division to attach to my 1814 Inf Corp, can I t...
by hos459
Sun Jun 09, 2013 10:44 pm
Forum: Field of Glory : Napoleonic Era 1792-1815 : General Discussion
Topic: 1700 to 1762
Replies: 89
Views: 25190

Re: 1700 to 1762

We have obviously not play enough games to resolve all problems. But what we have founded yet is that the only important rule change for the SYW is to suppress the -1 dice for being in extended line. Without this (and without skirmishes or battalion guns) extended line is the best formation for reg...
by hos459
Wed May 22, 2013 11:33 am
Forum: Campaigns
Topic: Campaign to Tabletop, Rules?
Replies: 1
Views: 1284

Campaign to Tabletop, Rules?

So...what rules are people using to convert things like campaign attrition, fatigue, losses from earlier battles etc etc onto the tabletop?

eg a Division has taken 20% losses in a previous battle....how to represent this on the tabletop for the next?
by hos459
Mon May 20, 2013 3:04 am
Forum: Field of Glory : Napoleonic Era 1792-1815 : General Discussion
Topic: 1700 to 1762
Replies: 89
Views: 25190

Re: 1700 to 1762

The basic units should be regiment level even maybe batallion, there were no divisions, quality of Army leaders should not be as generic as in FOGN (to many exceptional leaders in my view). Batalion guns, some units had them others not. Skirmishers/croats/light inf functioned differently. Can't agr...

Go to advanced search